"Treatment as Prevention (TASP)": Large study fails to show a positive impact on reducing new HIV infections

In: hiv/July 2016/patients/people/Treatment as Prevention (TASP)
François Dabis
François Dabis at AIDS 2016. Photo by International AIDS Society / Abhi Indrarajan

The first large "test and treat" research study as a public health intervention to report its final results found that the strategy failed to reduce new HIV infections in the communities where it was provided.

Talking to 21st International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2016) in Durban, South Africa on Friday, François Dabis of the University of Bordeaux said that the data collection for the ANRS 12249 study was only completed a month ago. So your team has not yet been able to dig deeper to explain the findings.

But it is already clear that many individuals diagnosed with HIV were not tied to medical care or took many months to do so. Only 49% of people diagnosed went into treatment.

The study was much more successful in taking the HIV test to people who needed it - 92% of people with HIV knew their condition. And the treatment was highly effective in who adhered consistently to it, with 93% reaching undetectable viral load. These results were obtained in a poor rural area of ​​KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Therefore in terms of goals, the 90-90-90 study obtained 92-49-93. The crucial weakness in the middle stage may explain the lack of impact on new HIV infections. But the reasons for poor articulation for care will need to be unpacked.

Aim of the study with TASP (Treatment to Prevention - Treatment as Prevention)

The purpose of this ANRS 12249 study is to know the effectiveness of an HIV treatment as prevention (TasP) as a population-level intervention in an African community deeply burdened by HIV.

Considering that studies such as HPTN052 and Partner examined the impact of HIV treatment on individuals and couples, this is the first of five large randomized studies to examine the impact of a large-scale measure on the population with the TasP intervention or "treatment as Prevention" universal in African countries ". The aim of this study was to verify whether the approach would be able to "deliver" the treatment and whether this would be "acceptable to local communities," but its primary goal was to reduce the number of new infections.

Therefore, the primary outcome was HIV incidence, as measured by the general population.

HIV testThe study, which was conducted in the Hlabisa sub-district of KwaZulu-Natal. Located three hours drive from Durban, three out of ten people (30%) living there live with HIV - the highest prevalence in South Africa and one of the highest in the world. Earlier observational studies in the area had shown that the neighborhoods in which more people with HIV were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), the number of new infections was lower. However, could this approach be applied efficiently on a "large scale" basis and improve results even further? (Note from the translator: I see this with worried eyes, for from there to a drug dictatorship it is just one more step, and an interesting step for certain "sectors of our so well-balanced societies")

Study design and home-based interventions for TasP

This was a randomized controlled grouping study, in which the randomization units were geographic areas (Clusters * A term in Computer designates industries clusters on a hard disk (HD) or a group of 4 or more machines in synchronicity, working as redundant servers of the same content - I decided to leave the cluster and just set the title elucidation) of about one thousand residents each. There were 22 of these clusters in the studied area. They were divided into two groups, 11 intervention clusters and 11 control clusters.

Every six months the entire population (in both groups) was offered, based on a system of home collection, HIV testing and counseling. The Counselors involved were trained to go door-to-door, offering HIV testing at people's homes. Family members over the age of 16 years were offered quick testing and counseling individually in a space of greater privacy within the home.

This approach, already used successfully in the region, helps to overcome some of the barriers to access to testing services (Translator's note: I maintained an electronic relationship with an activist in Angola and she told me that there was a verse for the capital of Angola , Luanda, was honored with a verse that said something like this:

Luanda, Luanda

City that all leads.

"From day no water. "

At night lack light "-

Unfortunately I lost contact with her, who was via ICQ (for a long time ...), and to this day I wonder if she died of AIDS complications or because of "political complications", since the political stability of Africa and its mapping- which in no way respects ethnicities and natural limitations, such as a river or a mountain, could serve other purposes than the "subalterns" ... Just to illustrate this site is automatically translated into 58 languages ​​by GTranslate which does not charge me anything already , well, well, about three years - for some time it was not like that and I have a good level of visitation beyond the countries where Portuguese is spoken and, curiously, even in the Portuguese speaking nations in Africa, this it is the Continent - the most needy - and the less we visit - it is evident that there is a great structural problem and, in order not to take the conversation too far, observe a "political map of Africa and see how they are" "The boundary lines" traced "on that map. For me it's a lot ...). It can reach individuals who are harder to reach through other approaches, including adolescents living in rural areas and those with limited access to the formal health system (Translator's Note: [...]).

Subsequently, people diagnosed with HIV in immediate intervention clusters received the immediate offer of initiating ART, HIV treatment, regardless of symptoms or CD4 cell count. Individuals in the control cluster thus diagnosed received treatment based on the guidelines and guidelines of the South African national guidelines.

If you do not believe that the site Soropositivo.org is translated into 58 Languages, click this link and see in another tab of your browser

When the study began in 2012, there was a clear difference between the intervention and treatment of domestic approach in relation to national guidelines, which pray (...), as one day prayed in Brazil (and I am a victim of this in the midst of thousands ) treatment was only recommended for those with a CD4 cell count below 350 cells / mm3. However this level was changed in January from 2015 to 500 cells / mm3 (Click this link and see what says a large study called START - opens in another tab). These guidelines are about to change again to recommend treatment for all - as in the intervention arm.

It is worth noting that the only difference between the intervention and control groups was in terms of eligibility for HIV treatment. Otherwise, there were few differences between the arms: door-to-door testing occurred in both; with relative proximity to clinical HIV treatment centers (within a walk of approximately 45 minutes of all households) were provided to both.

Although the researchers describe the strategy tested as a "universal test and treat" model, any difference that might have been observed between the control and intervention groups should only be due to the change in treatment eligibility. Unlike some other tests and treatment studies, control arm intervention does not include a more intensive HIV testing or additional changes to make medical services easier to use.


There were 28,153 people in the study population at the start of the study. There were fewer men, 37%, than the women enrolled in the study. The majority of people affected were in the age range between 22 and 50 years, with an average age of 30.

As expected, 31% of people were already living with HIV. Only 34% of them were on HIV treatment.

The door-to-door testing program was able to provide HIV testing at least once to 88% of people contacted. And in each round of tests, more than 70% of contacts, accepted the offer to repeat the test.

Antiretroviral Therapy
It's not always like that. There are schemes with three tablets a day, once a day. As an example the combination of lamivudine in one tablet, associated with atazanavir, a capsule and Norvir, a relatively small tablet once a day.

But when individuals were diagnosed, the articulation for care with their own health proved to be poor:

  • Three months after diagnosis, 28% had sought a clinic to initiate ART.
  • Six months after diagnosis, 36% had sought a clinic to initiate ART.
  • Twelve months after diagnosis, 47% had sought a clinic to initiate ART.



In general, there were new 495 registered HIV infections, over 22,434 person-years (opens on another tab). This equates to an annual incidence of 2,21% (that is, each year, two people in a cluster of 100 had just acquired HIV) (Editor's Note: It seems a little, but it seems only if we reduce Brazil's population to one hundred million of people, every year, two million and two hundred thousand people would contract HIV per year and paste you multiply by five and see the size of the humanitarian crisis - Has anyone here read Dante's Inferno?)

Incidence rates did not differ between intervention clusters (2,13%) and control clusters (2,27%) - this difference was not statistically significant.

"Universal testing and treatment strategy did not have a measurable effect on the incidence of HIV during the course of the study," said François Dabis.

However, he pointed out two pieces of "good news" from the study. First, there was good acceptance of the offer of repeated HIV testing at home, with almost all people being tested at least once. Second, the virological response to HIV treatment was excellent in those who took ART with adequate adherence.

Explaining the results

The analysis presented today was preliminary (the data collection was completed only a month ago). Dabis said that other analyzes will try to gain a better understanding of how the results differed between men and women and for people of different age groups.

Researchers will try to clarify the reasons why people do not care about a care system (It's their lives !!!!) - Would the explanation lie in how health services are provided, individual factors, or community stigmas? They seek to better understand the differences between the profile of individuals reached and not affected by the interventions.

During the discussion, Myron Cohen of the University of North Carolina suggested that delays in linking to care could mean that individuals with disproportionately recent HIV infection contributed to subsequent transmission. In addition, it will be important to understand the impact of sexual migration and transmission when they reach outside the boundaries of the study area networks, which may contribute to new HIV infections. (NE: A smell of xenophobia ...)

François Dabis said that although the study was formulated on the assumption of a TasP (Treatment as Prevention) effect after four years of follow-up, it may take longer to have an impact on the incidence, in light of the slowness of the articulation of care towards one's own health.

Other delegates suggested that intervention clusters may not have received a package of interventions that was sufficiently intense compared to control clusters. For example, a more intensive approach to helping people link to clinical care (counseling, awareness) as in the door-to-door clusters for initiating treatment for HIV infection, which could have impact, leading to more people being treated.

(Here speaks again the editor: In vain the complete state of inefficiency in financing -just prevention campaigns as an example, given "concession" of television channel use was renewed and no one thought to write a contractual clause requiring the production, the support of the NGOs working with "it" since "it is this" educational videos and the obligation to sprinkle them throughout the display grid with a minimum ratio of 5% {I know it's little, but would already be something} of total programming "granted, which does little about the facts, and when it does, makes fudge and clumsy way generating unfortunately counterproductive effects! I'm Pissy")

Sheri Lippman of the University of California, presiding over the session, commented that it may take longer than finding technical solutions than dealing with the structural barriers to commitment to self-care that subsist on a level for which I can not get another adjective, if not deplorable .

Posted in: 23 July 2016

Roger Pebody

Roger Pebody

Roger Pebody

Claudio Souza - Seropositive from 1994
Claudio Souza

Translated by Claudio original Souzado site Aidsmap Article 'Test and treat': large study fails to show an impact on new HIV infections | Review Pending


Dabis F et al. The impact of universal test and treat on HIV incidence in a rural South African population: ANRS 12249 TASP trial, 2012-2016. 21st International AIDS Conference, Durban, abstract FRAC0105LB, 2016.

View the abstract on the conference website.

Download the presentation slides from the conference website.

Yes, this is the photo of me! My niece asked me to put this picture on my profile! .... I had here a description of me that one person described as "irreverent". This is really a euphemistic way of classifying what was here. All I know is that an "NGO" which occupies a building of 10 floors has established a partnership with me, and I have the logs of the partnership time, which was more a vampirism because for each 150 people leaving my site, clicking on them, there was, on average, one that came in. WHEN I ENTERED AND ENTERED


Leave a Reply

Your email address Will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your feedback data is processed.

The latest since:

We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By accepting the use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.

End of the Line for you! Back to Top! Is Over Here ;-)
%d Bloggers like this: