The Banalization of AIDS: "Just a Little Comprimidinho"
Sometimes I pretend I do not see things and, in fact, I even avoid seeing them. But my readers come to me, they ask me questions and I see things that I can not silence so I put them here because they forced me to put this video online now, instead of only in December, however, some facts have arrived and I do not I was silent.
The fact is that I read that one does not die more of AIDS (and this is a "half-truth because it depends almost to have"luck"And being diagnosed prematurely) and that all is well.
I will paste an image from another site that was what led me to put this text and this video here.
The fact is that I saw on google SNNIPET a message that aroused my curiosity and I went there to take a peek and what I saw left me perplexed:
To say such a thing, without a scientific basis, from the armored platform where it hides, behind an avatar, implies a great responsibility and I, who am patient of the House of AIDS and I go there every six months, I always end up finding someone who is debilitated, or in the situation of a wheelchair, or a person who has lost his sight, for example, due to a cytomegalovirus retinitis which, if he had "luck", will have lost the vision of "just an eye" ... On the other hand, I will never be able to erase from the retinas of my memory the youthful and happy face of that beautiful girl who suffered from a bacterium that no one was able to untangle her nature, resistant to everything what had been tried on her, bacteria that had lodged in her labyrinth, taking away the capacity of balance ...
I was "new to it" and I asked foolishly,
- "And that's why you use a wheelchair? - I asked saddened
I was down and ask that lowered my head. She took my head, made me look at her in the eyes and told me, smiling:
- "That's just on the street," and winked at me - "At home I can walk supported on the walls" ...
BANALIZED AIDS IS IRRESPONSIBLE THING
The favorable reality is set for those who are "lucky" to be diagnosed prematurely and therefore can live without becoming an AIDS case, unfortunately this is a low percentage of those diagnosed and it should be remembered that between the year 2000 and 2011 die, due to complications generated by AIDS, eleven thousand people.
I am an AIDS case because, at the time I was in treatment, the primer told me to recite the treatment prescription when the CD4 count reached 350 per ml, regardless of the viral load, and today the primer reads, and this is very good, that the treatment starts immediately after the diagnosis, based on a long and extensive study called START (this link opens a window to almost everything I have on this study and you can understand why my gesture of copying and pasting images from another site). The fact is that I regard the text in question as an exhortation to unprotected sex; I, as a person living with HIV and AIDS being undetectable ten years ago, would never risk a sexual relationship without a condom under any pretext because I have knowledge (information is everything) of an organic phenomenon called BLIPE VIRAL (tb opens another flap).
Ipsis literis Banalization of AIDS -
The name "Ledos" must be conjugated by the "ledo engano"!
And, on the other hand, a person who "goes to the site, left with this pearl of definition of treatment against HIV:
The Author of this pearl has a brain consists of eight interconnected lentils by cobwebs of wires? Would it be this.
I leave the video below for all to see. He has over 40 minutes and you have to be very interested in watching it.
Here I put another video
and below, an important document.
Good reading and get rid of this banalizing AIDS thing
The re-emergence of the AIDS epidemic in Brazil: Challenges and prospects for solving them
Last December, when we celebrated the World Day of fight against AIDS, the spread of epidemic trends in mundo1 and Brasil2 by the United Nations and the Ministry of Health showed contradictions and questions raised.
Against the world stage, Brazilian data show that AIDS is far from being controlled and which reached its worst indicators in these more than thirty years of the disease. Since 2011 the barrier of forty thousand new cases per year was exceeded, with no signs that will again reduce in a short period of time.
AIDS has rebounded
He returned to grow the number of cases among homosexuals, accompanied by the highest concentration of the epidemic in urban centers and increasing male / female ratio, especially due to the reduction of HIV transmission through shared injection drug use and slowing transmission heterosexual.
A new generation, born after the mid-1990 also began to show higher incidence rates than those recorded among those who began their sexual life after the epidemic began.
An epidemiological profile that, in a way, back to take similar characteristics to that seen in the early years of 1980 when the disease began to make its first victims and presented a strongly concentrated focus on specific social segments.
Now, however, with incidence rates and more alarming mortality. But what else shows the re-emergence of the disease in the country is the trend of mortality. After reduction followed years the number of deaths and the mortality rate began to grow again.
Only in 2013 12.700 were cases of deaths from the disease, a similar number to the 15 years ago, when the antiretroviral drugs access policy was implemented. In the last seven years the growth of the national mortality rate increased by just over 5%, from 5,9% per hundred thousand inhabitants in 2006, 6,2% for per hundred thousand inhabitants, in 2013.
AIDS is Serious Thing
In the North, Northeast and South rates they came to be up to two times higher than in the period prior to access to antiretroviral drugs policy, counteracting all the advances previously observed in these locations. The resurgence of AIDS in Brazil comes at a time when the accumulated scientific knowledge in the field cast auspicious prospects for controlling the epidemic in the world.
Studies on the effects of antiretroviral drugs used in everyday saúde3 services show that people treated in the early stages of infection had a life expectancy close to uninfected people. This allows us to distinguish a scenario where death from AIDS should be an increasingly rare event.
The greatest enthusiasm, however, came from studies that reported the reduction of more than 90% of HIV transmission in antiretroviral-treated HIV-positive people and with complete suppression of viral replication.
A protection rate higher than in condom distribution programs. Based on this new scenario, the study matemática6 modeling have indicated that diagnosis and universal treatment of infected people would have the potential to eliminate the occurrence of new infections.
This has prompted the United Nations to urge countries to deploy up to 2020 ambitious programs to diagnose 90% of people with HIV, treat 90% with antiretrovirals and make 90% of those treated have undetectable viral load.
It's called 90-90-90 goal, according to the United Nations, could lead to the end of the epidemic in the world until 2030.
The 90-90-90 Triad Yem the desire to End the epidemic in 2030.
In addition to the controversy about the feasibility of epidemic control strategies based on drug treatment achieve full success - just observe the permanence of tuberculosis and leprosy as major public health problems, despite the existence of effective treatments for healing and to avoid transmission of infections - the UN proposal brought to the center of the debate the ability of health systems to absorb a large number of infected people and the quality of care provided to them.
And talk to Healing by 2020! God bless them for being honest.
In Brazil, the Ministry of Saúde2 data on the "continuous treatment" - with the estimated number of people infected in the country and the percentage of those who know the diagnosis and effective treatment are - pointed to a surprising picture:
The number of infected people who know their diagnosis and are out of health services or with detectable viral load (296000) is about twice the number of people (145000) who do not know their diagnosis.
A clear difficulty of policies to ensure clinical follow-up and adherence to treatment in a sustainable manner over time. Since the beginning of the epidemic, even in the years 1980, a network of care to people infected has been deployed in the country based on the principles of comprehensiveness and interdisciplinarity and quality assessments showing structures and work processes relatively satisfactory for significant portions of the units of health.
In recent years, however, part of this network has been penalized due to underfunding of the Unified Health System (SUS) and the weakening of the response to AIDS in the country.
The recent proposal of the Ministry of Health that network strengthening by expanding care of people infected in primary care leaves questions about its effectiveness. It is true that positive experiences were observed in deployed services at this level of attention, however, evaluations also showed that the worst quality indicators focused on the less complex services.
For those who say that I am "fuck em" with my pessimism I must retort by saying.
Sex, but do not fuck!
Below are some data from a PDF whose origin and link to the document I put below this text:
** DN - National STD / AIDS and Viral Hepatitis - AIDS cases by the CDC criteria Adapted - Lymphocyte Count + T CD4 less than 350 cells / mm3 *** was not performed relationship between the base and the deaths SINAN
DOI: 10.1590 / 1807-57622015.0038 6 editorial COMMUNICATION HEALTH EDUCATION 2015; 19 (52): 5-6
AND STILL THERE WHO SAY "ALMOST seronegative" THAT NOBODY DIES OF AIDS AND OTHER MORE TELLING USE "little medicine" A LITTLE LATER IN ORDER TO GO TO THE BALLAD AND YOUR HEALTH, AS CARRIER HIV GO TO IMPROVE