Undetectable Viral Load Gives Negative or Non-Reagent Test?
This question about viral load comes up a lot to me! And I understand the anguish it generates, because it can be so much easier to conduct yourself in emotional and sexual life if things were like that, but it's not.
Undetectable viral load does not generate a “negative” or “unreactive” test for HIV. What you need to understand, first of all, is that this is, in short, the other side of the immune window problem; Once the period is over and the seroconversion has arrived, the antibodies against HIV will arise and will no longer disappear.
And see this article on viral load, treatment and PrEP.
At least as long as there is HIV in the body. If you think about how vaccines work, it is very likely that it will never go away. There is something called immune memory. When we are “invaded” by an offending agent, the body form defenses against it and never stop making antibodies!
The Search Is For Antibodies
When we want to, and I well know that for some this wanting to know if the undetectable viral load gives negative test shows in you the great doubt about being worthy or to be loved.
And see, make sure you are, yes, and very worthy or worthy to be an object | (not just sexual) | but object, target, focus of someone else's love. Because we all are! Even a stranger passing you on a street can see you, feel you, and love you for ten seconds….
What happens in the viral load is undetectableis that you have a number of viruses, it is quite interesting to explain that they are "copies of the virus" in such a small amount that the tests for HIV or its copies are not able to detect them!
This does not mean that the virus is not there, it is, but in quantities as I said very low. Our body maintains the "Alertness" keeps the antibodies in the body.
And tests for HIV serology do not look for the presence of the virus, they look for antibodies! For if you cool your head, refocus your spirit and look at it head-on, fearlessly, refusing to accept that “a simple virus” takes the helm of your life, and that may well be happening in your mind. scared head you will see that in front of someone who loves you TRULY, IT WILL BE FULLY AND COMPLETELY INDIFFERENT IF a Undetectable viral load do not give a negative test or not! Because if a person is stupid enough to see it as a problem…. Well, she doesn't love you. And if you love, you don't know how to love.
Love is unconditional, or not love.
I lived on a street in downtown sampa and in front of all the buildings on one side of the street there was only one wall, one low wall! B Cris left me a graffiti there. AND I don't know if it was stung before I entered the building at dawn and I didn't see it, or if it was stung after.
What I remember is that, about 15: 00, after a shower and a round of sex with ANOTHER PERSON (I AM A DAMN) I came out of the building and, straight on, was written like this:
DJ! For being love, invade and end!
Love you, and love to feel it!CRHIS
And I felt like the last albino hippopotamus of Venus 😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰
And this is the first of the reasons I find to explain to you, as I see it, a rather sinister reason for the exams to continue to react. ”
So, as far as I know, and I know as far as I've read and heard, but also, based on everything I've talked to doctors and my friends or my friends, this reagent result doesn't change after we get infected!
If you have any questions about this, leave it in the comments and I will try to answer!
I may take a long time, but I always answer. And see, Viral Load Undetectable Gives Negative Test?
Not! No, it is not! Undetectable viral load does not give negative test. But if your question is because of emotional life, I ask you:
The person you would have to lie to this way is worth, really worth, this your feeling?
I do not think so!
Since I am not a doctor or a scientist, I write only on the basis of what I have learned, what I have read, and what God allows me to imagine, with the intelligence He has given me that, I know, is not the greatest!
But it is far from "limited".
The bottom line is that the person with HIV seems to be ashamed of their condition. What's even worse: I have friends who are ashamed of my condition and hide it, hiding me, even from people who might have a closer look. “Interested in my work! I need help, understand that! ”
From time to time, for one reason or another, in any conversation, or very specific, someone tells me, puzzling, astonished, and desolate:
I KNOW ALL YOUR PROBLEMS AND LIMITATIONS, WE CAN SOLVE THIS.
One image, a thousand words.
And that has literally kept me a watertight enclosure, excluding me from contact with the people with whom he relates because he knows I am not ashamed of my HIV status.
He knows that I will quickly imply that I have HIV and that I have a job that is a blog that you are now, Soropositivo.Org. This blog site, I don't know, is the only truly good and decent thing I've ever done, so forgive me, I'm proud of it!
But in this text, I look for something:
I wanted to and God knows how much I want is to make you understand that being with HIV is not a reason for shame. No one "deserves to be sick," and there is no single reason why you should be ashamed. Especially because me, you who read me, and the person on the other device, and each of them, reading this text are not like that, so damn, and in my case, I'm not that son of a bitch.
First Symptoms of HIV -
This sentence is constructed the wrong way!
The correct way to express yourself is:
Early Symptoms Of Infection With HIV.
And it is important to emphasize: The HIV virus does not exist! HIV is a virus. It is the virus "da!" AIDS (Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome).
All this to inform that I am translating, and of course I need a revision, to a text whose title will be:
The First Symptoms of HIV Infection
I've been trying to post four to five times a week, but that's hard to do
This is a story that few can tell!